Analysis Breaks down the computer ranknigs listed on Kenneth Massey's College Football Ratings Comparison pageas ranked ballots using a variety of vote-counting methods. Top 25 T25 Correlations Borda Majority Consensus Pairwise Matrix Correlations Conference Ranks Weighted ViolationsCommentary
Reference
- Standings
- Index to team and conference schedules
- Consolidated Schedules and Results
- This is a consolidated and indexed version of Dr. Peter Wolfe's schedules and scores pages.
(All score errors are my mistakes.)- Division 1A
- Division 1AA
- Division 2
- Division 3
- NAIA
- Scoreboards
- FBS FCS D2 D3 NAIA
- Interdivisional Results with scoring analysis
- Division 1 schedule by week
- Upcoming FBS v FBS games sorted by Rank-Based Interest Factor
- Interconference results for FBS Conferences
- Division and Conference Affiliations
- For all teams, based upon Dr. Wolfe's NCAA and NAIA Divisional and Conference Affiliations page.
- cfbstats.com
- Splits and situational stats - inside box scores
Ratings There are 242 teams of the 262 in Division 1 whose schedules are well-enough connected by the end of the year to be included in my ratings.
- ISR
- Boyd Nation's Iterative Strength Rating
- ISOV2
- Improved ISOV
Scoring data adjusted by opponents' ISOV2 strength- Directed Games Graph Metrics
- Weighted Win Paths
See the WWP definition- The below are not "ratings" per se, but count and make visible all of the shortest "A beat B beat C beat ..." (A⇒) chains in the current games graph.
- Second Order Winning Percentage
% of teams that the given team has a shorter or stronger A⇒... chain to other teams than the other way around. (D1A Only D1AA Only D2 D3 NAIA)- Weighted
by the length and strength of the A⇒ paths to other teams. (D1A Only D1AA Only D2 D3 NAIA)Often people who are not familiar with the nature and limitations of statistical methods tend to expect too much of the rating system. Ratings provide merely a comparison of performances, no more and no less. The measurement of the performance of an individual is always made relative to the performance of his competitors and both the performance of the player and of his opponents are subject to much the same random fluctuations. The measurement of the rating of an individual might well be compared with the measurement of the position of a cork bobbing up and down on the surface of agitated water with a yard stick tied to a rope and which is swaying in the wind.Arpad Elo in Chess Life, 1962 In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; In practice, there is. — Chuck Reid
A free press can of course be good and bad but a press that is not free can never be anything but bad. — Albert Camus
2022 Home Page 2021 Home Page 2020 Home Page (such as it was) 2019 Home Page 2018 Home Page 2017 Home Page 2016 Home Page 2015 Home Page 2014 Home Page 2013 Home Page 2012 Home Page 2011 Home Page 2010 Home Page 2009 Home Page 2008 Home Page 2007 Home Page 2006 Home Page 2005 Home Page 2004 Home Page
© Copyright 2021, Paul Kislanko
Football Home