Rating Games Played - Upsets
6 September, 2007
Well, the first weekend of 2007 certainly did not disappoint. Unless you were a Michigan fan who really thought the Wolverines were a top ten team, I suppose. Many commentators, including some who should know better, immediately labeled Appalachian State 34 Michigan 32 as the biggest upset of all time. Historic, yes - biggest, no.
It was just a few days before the first game when I published a technique to rate upsets on an absolute scale. Weekend one provides some excellent examples on the difference between "a surprise" and an upset. When a lower-ranked team beats a higher-ranked team, it's a surprise. How much of an upset it is depends upon the final rankings - maybe the teams were just ranked incorrectly.
For example, based upon the Pre-Season Bucklin Majority of the computer rankings tracked by Kenneth Massey there were 12 "surprises" in week one.
SF | VR | HR | Date | Visitor | VS | | Home | HS | OT |
14.13 | 121 | 8 | 9/1/2007 | Appalachian St | 34 | @ | Michigan | 32 |
1.04 | 100 | 49 | 9/1/2007 | Bowling Green | 32 | @ | Minnesota | 31 | 1 |
1.02 | 53 | 71 | 9/1/2007 | Virginia | 3 | @ | Wyoming | 23 |
0.74 | 32 | 27 | 9/1/2007 | Georgia Tech | 33 | @ | Notre Dame | 3 |
0.36 | 94 | 69 | 9/1/2007 | Central Florida | 25 | @ | North Carolina St | 23 |
0.36 | 69 | 94 | 9/1/2007 | New Mexico | 6 | @ | UTEP | 10 |
0.34 | 121 | 90 | 9/1/2007 | Nicholls St | 16 | @ | Rice | 14 |
0.33 | 55 | 58 | 9/1/2007 | Central Michigan | 7 | @ | Kansas | 52 |
0.20 | 97 | 88 | 8/30/2007 | Kent St | 23 | @ | Iowa St | 14 |
0.17 | 92 | 100 | 9/1/2007 | Middle Tennessee St | 14 | @ | Florida Atlantic | 27 |
0.08 | 97 | 90 | 8/30/2007 | Miami OH | 14 | @ | Ball St | 13 |
0.07 | 30 | 32 | 9/3/2007 | Florida St | 18 | @ | Clemson | 24 |
|
Sure enough, the Mountaineers' win at Michigan on an absolute scale would be very slightly bigger than the biggest upset of 2006 (Auburn's win over the eventual champion.)
But what if Michigan wasn't the eighth-best team in the first place? After all the computers take the first week's results into account, there are only four games for which the results are inconsistent with the ratings:
SF | VR | HR | Date | Visitor | VS | | Home | HS | OT |
3.48 | 121 | 27 | 9/1/2007 | Appalachian St | 34 | @ | Michigan | 32 |
0.22 | 82 | 67 | 9/1/2007 | Bowling Green | 32 | @ | Minnesota | 31 | 1 |
0.19 | 121 | 102 | 9/1/2007 | Nicholls St | 16 | @ | Rice | 14 |
0.05 | 77 | 81 | 9/1/2007 | New Mexico | 6 | @ | UTEP | 10 |
|
Appalachian State-Michigan is still the biggest upset so far, but nowhere near the biggest of last season.
Of course, Michigan can move up a lot as the year progresses, or down. How big this will be seen in hindsight won't really be known for another 11 or 12 games.
When a game's results don't match a rating's rankings after the game is played, the game is referred to as a retrodictive ranking violation. We can use the surprise factor to weight the RRVs by team and by rating:
AvgWV | Team | UCS | HAW | MAR | BAS | CLA | RUD | CGV | SAG | KEE | PFZ | LAZ | MAS | BMC | CPA | CPR | BDF | BMaj | BIL | GM | LAW | BRN | MOR | HOW | SOL | ERD | DWI | DES | D1A | PIG | DOK | DKC | SOR | NUT | KAM | CSL |
4.7785 | Michigan | 0.1687 | 0.7423 | 1.5847 | 1.3269 | 1.4694 | 1.7500 | 1.5745 | 2.1256 | 2.5588 | 3.3333 | 2.6667 | 3.4815 | 2.6667 | 3.8400 | 3.8400 | 2.2727 | 3.4815 | 3.6538 | 3.1724 | 3.3214 | 3.8400 | 4.5000 | 5.7222 | 5.5000 | 5.5000 | 7.6667 | 4.5000 | 5.5000 | 12.4444 | 1.0000 | 2.9323 | 14.1250 | 14.1250 | 19.1667 | 5.7222 |
0.6184 | Kansas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.7570 | 2.3478 | | | 7.4595 | | | | 1.8000 |
0.6184 | Central Michigan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.7570 | 2.3478 | | | 7.4595 | | | | 1.8000 |
0.3121 | Minnesota | | | | | | | 0.1216 | | | | 0.3913 | 0.6667 | 0.2785 | | | 0.7292 | 0.2239 | | 0.3167 | 0.5769 | 0.8000 | 0.9778 | 0.2453 | 0.3731 | 0.8679 | | 0.1324 | 0.5424 | 0.1944 | 1.1220 | 0.4925 | 0.7414 | 1.2444 | 0.3666 | 0.2278 |
0.3121 | Bowling Green | | | | | | | 0.1216 | | | | 0.3913 | 0.6667 | 0.2785 | | | 0.7292 | 0.2239 | | 0.3167 | 0.5769 | 0.8000 | 0.9778 | 0.2453 | 0.3731 | 0.8679 | | 0.1324 | 0.5424 | 0.1944 | 1.1220 | 0.4925 | 0.7414 | 1.2444 | 0.3666 | 0.2278 |
0.2848 | Rice | 0.4313 | 0.3175 | 0.1524 | 0.2542 | 0.1192 | 0.5217 | 0.2222 | 0.4313 | 0.1416 | 0.9991 | 0.1237 | 0.8357 | 0.4698 | 0.2542 | 0.3419 | 0.1748 | 0.1863 | 0.4578 | 0.1863 | 0.3444 | 0.1524 | 0.2642 | 0.2100 | 0.7423 | 0.1863 | 0.2474 | 0.8597 | 0.7423 | 0.1384 | 0.3297 | 0.4448 | 0.4757 | 0.2872 | 0.3152 | 1.5283 |
0.1183 | New Mexico | | | 0.3896 | | | | 0.6667 | | 0.2933 | | 0.2667 | | | | | 0.4366 | 0.5195 | | 0.3934 | 0.6667 | 0.2000 | 0.3333 | | 0.2833 | 0.2468 | | 0.1343 | 0.8974 | 0.5263 | 0.4366 | | 0.7588 | 0.5128 | 0.1765 | 0.9333 |
0.1183 | UTEP | | | 0.3896 | | | | 0.6667 | | 0.2933 | | 0.2667 | | | | | 0.4366 | 0.5195 | | 0.3934 | 0.6667 | 0.2000 | 0.3333 | | 0.2833 | 0.2468 | | 0.1343 | 0.8974 | 0.5263 | 0.4366 | | 0.7588 | 0.5128 | 0.1765 | 0.9333 |
0.1156 | Georgia Tech | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.9565 | 1.9999 | | |
0.1156 | Notre Dame | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.9565 | 1.9999 | | |
0.0853 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2742 | | 0.1364 | | | | | | 0.4219 | | 0.1486 | 0.1842 | 0.1184 | | 0.3288 | | 0.6897 | | | 0.4424 | | 0.6250 | 0.5246 | 0.2754 |
0.0853 | North Carolina St | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2742 | | 0.1364 | | | | | | 0.4219 | | 0.1486 | 0.1842 | 0.1184 | | 0.3288 | | 0.6897 | | | 0.4424 | | 0.6250 | 0.5246 | 0.2754 |
0.0764 | Miami-Ohio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2273 | | | 0.9323 | 0.4494 | 0.2779 | 0.2727 | | 0.1444 | 0.2400 | | 0.4545 | 0.3133 | | | 0.2198 | 0.1721 | 0.2857 | | 0.2750 |
0.0764 | Ball State | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2273 | | | 0.9323 | 0.4494 | 0.2779 | 0.2727 | | 0.1444 | 0.2400 | | 0.4545 | 0.3133 | | | 0.2198 | 0.1721 | 0.2857 | | 0.2750 |
0.0610 | Florida Atlantic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2225 | | | | 0.4545 | | | | 0.6667 | 0.3250 | 0.2245 | | 0.2623 |
0.0610 | Middle Tenn St | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2225 | | | | 0.4545 | | | | 0.6667 | 0.3250 | 0.2245 | | 0.2623 |
0.0538 | Kent St | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2390 | | | | | | | | | | 0.6818 | 0.6522 | 0.1840 | | 0.6897 | | | | | 0.7297 | | | 0.7429 | |
0.0538 | Iowa State | | | | | | | | | | | 0.2390 | | | | | | | | | | 0.6818 | 0.6522 | 0.1840 | | 0.6897 | | | | | 0.7297 | | | 0.7429 | |
0.0518 | Arizona St | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.8140 |
0.0518 | San Jose St | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.8140 |
0.0438 | Clemson | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.3769 | | | 0.1250 | | | | | | | 0.1154 | 0.1667 | | | | | 0.6667 | 0.7500 | | | | |
0.0438 | Florida St | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.3769 | | | 0.1250 | | | | | | | 0.1154 | 0.1667 | | | | | 0.6667 | 0.7500 | | | | |
0.0413 | Wyoming | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.9524 | | 0.1111 | | | | | | 1.2391 | | | | |
0.0413 | Virginia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.9524 | | 0.1111 | | | | | | 1.2391 | | | | |
0.0279 | Oregon | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.6000 | | | | | | | | 0.3750 |
AvgWV | Team | UCS | HAW | MAR | BAS | CLA | RUD | CGV | SAG | KEE | PFZ | LAZ | MAS | BMC | CPA | CPR | BDF | BMaj | BIL | GM | LAW | BRN | MOR | HOW | SOL | ERD | DWI | DES | D1A | PIG | DOK | DKC | SOR | NUT | KAM | CSL |
0.0279 | Houston | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.6000 | | | | | | | | 0.3750 |
0.0190 | Colorado | | | | | | | 0.6976 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.7273 | | | | | | 0.2656 | | | | | 0.2677 | | | |
0.0190 | Colorado St | | | | | | | 0.6976 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.7273 | | | | | | 0.2656 | | | | | 0.2677 | | | |
0.0087 | Iowa | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.3585 |
0.0087 | Northern Illinois | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.3585 |
0.0028 | Mississippi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.9722 | | | | | | | | |
0.0028 | Memphis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.9722 | | | | | | | | |
0.0003 | Akron | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.1526 | | | | |
0.0003 | Army | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.1526 | | | | |
0.0000 | (84 teams) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| WtdViol | 0.0001 | 0.0013 | 0.0016 | 0.0018 | 0.0021 | 0.0024 | 0.0027 | 0.0028 | 0.0039 | 0.0041 | 0.0046 | 0.0048 | 0.0050 | 0.0051 | 0.0051 | 0.0052 | 0.0052 | 0.0054 | 0.0060 | 0.0066 | 0.0070 | 0.0088 | 0.0089 | 0.0090 | 0.0092 | 0.0101 | 0.0116 | 0.0119 | 0.0169 | 0.0198 | 0.0200 | 0.0224 | 0.0230 | 0.0267 | 0.0272 |
| Viol Counts | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
|
Note that by some ratings the only violations are "unranked" teams' wins and for others there are more violations than shown in the table above. The tables above were based upon essentially the median rankings, and is shown in the column labeled BMaj.