The 2009 Schedule
I suppose not penalizing FBS teams for playing FCS teams every year is just something we'll have to live with. At least the problem isn't getting worse from year to year. This matters because most good rating systems do a better job if at least half of all team-pairs are no more than an opponents' opponent apart (meaning the paired teams have at least one common opponent.)
Season | APL | CI | | #O | #OO | N3 | N4 |
2006 | 2.49 | | Total Pairs | 677 | 2570 | 3461 | 313 |
| | 46.20 | Percent | 9.60 | 36.60 | 49.30 | 4.50 |
| | | | | | |
2007 | 2.48 | | Total Pairs | 675 | 2548 | 3532 | 266 |
| | 45.90 | Percent | 9.60 | 36.30 | 50.30 | 3.80 |
| | | | | | |
2008 | 2.46 | | Total Pairs | 678 | 2686 | 3562 | 214 |
| | 47.11 | Percent | 9.50 | 37.62 | 49.89 | 3.00 |
|
2009 | 2.48 | | Total Pairs | 675 | 2631 | 3597 | 237 |
| | 46.30 | Percent | 9.45 | 36.85 | 50.38 | 3.32 |
|
Only 24 teams are related to more than half the FBS field by no worse than an O-O relatinship.
See Distance Matrix by Team for the complete list.
Notice that Rutgers, Kansas St, South Florida, Duke, North Carolina, North Carolina St and Mississippi each have two FCS opponents scheduled. There oughta be a law...
Our favorite bar-fight fodder
Date | Visitor | | Home | Locn |
3-Sep | Oregon | @ | Boise St |
5-Sep | Kentucky | vs | Miami OH | (Cincinnati OH) |
5-Sep | Connecticut | @ | Ohio U. |
5-Sep | Brigham Young | vs | Oklahoma | (Arlington TX) |
6-Sep | Mississippi | @ | Memphis |
11-Sep | Colorado | @ | Toledo |
12-Sep | Duke | @ | Army |
12-Sep | Pittsburgh | @ | Buffalo |
12-Sep | Kansas St | @ | Louisiana-Lafayette |
12-Sep | Oregon St | @ | UNLV |
12-Sep | Kansas | @ | UTEP |
12-Sep | South Florida | @ | Western Kentucky |
12-Sep | Texas | @ | Wyoming |
12-Sep | Hawaii | vs | Washington St | (Seattle WA) |
19-Sep | Indiana | @ | Akron |
19-Sep | Florida St | @ | Brigham Young |
19-Sep | Iowa St | @ | Kent St |
19-Sep | Virginia | @ | Southern Miss |
19-Sep | Ohio State | vs | Toledo | (Cleveland OH) |
25-Sep | Missouri | @ | Nevada |
26-Sep | Texas Tech | @ | Houston |
26-Sep | Vanderbilt | @ | Rice |
26-Sep | Louisville | @ | Utah |
3-Oct | Cincinnati | @ | Miami OH |
10-Oct | Vanderbilt | @ | Army |
17-Oct | Miami FL | @ | Central Florida |
17-Oct | Mississippi St | @ | Middle Tennessee St |
23-Oct | Rutgers | @ | Army |
24-Oct | Wake Forest | @ | Navy |
5-Nov | Virginia Tech | @ | East Carolina |
5-Dec | Wisconsin | @ | Hawaii |
|
There are 113 games scheduled between AQ conference teams and non-AQ conference teams. 31 (27 percent!) are road games for the AQ conference team (or "neutral" site games):
Here's the Complete List.
I don't consider every win by a nonAQ-conference team over an AQ-conference team to be an "upset" but I do see some potential for true upsets in this list. Bet you do, too,
Naturally, almost all of these are in September. There's less of a distinct "pre-(conference)-season" in football than basketball or baseball, but there's enough of it that most of the interconference games come before anybody has a lot of opponents' game film to study.
This is where I add my annual observation that fans of the nonAQ-confererence teams usually make too much of the "they won't play us" and "they won't play at our place" arguments. This year the AQ-conference teams have 220 non-conference scheduling opportunities. They waste 57 of those for home dates vs FCS teams, devote 113 to teams from nonAQ-conferences, leaving 50 for AQ-conference team vs other AQ-conference team.
The AQ-conference teams can't win for losing. If they schedule more games against teams from non-AQ conferences we complain they don't play enough against each other. As I pointed out last year, scheduling is harder than we think.
Our second-favorite bar-fight fodder - Scheduled Interconference Games
| ACC | BigE | B10 | B12 | ND | P10 | SEC | CUSA | Ind | MAC | MW | SBC | WAC | FCS |
ACC | ∗ | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
BigE | 5 | ∗ | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
B10 | 1 | 4 | ∗ | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
B12 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ∗ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
ND | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | ∗ | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
P10 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | ∗ | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
SEC | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | ∗ | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 11 |
CUSA | 5 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 6 | ∗ | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
Ind | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | ∗ | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
MAC | 2 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | ∗ | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
MW | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | ∗ | 1 | 10 | 6 |
SBC | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | ∗ | 0 | 4 |
WAC | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | ∗ | 7 |
FCS | 14 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | ∗ |
|
ACC teams play more FCS opponents than any other AQ conference, but also more games against teams from other AQ-conference.
Next time I'll look at schedule strengths and for games to really look forward to.